Historians have studied extensively how sciences begin. But how do they end? Previous attention to the founding, disciplinisation, and professionalisation of individual sciences has provided robust frameworks in which to think about the birth and growth of scientific knowledge communities. Less attention has been directed at how those same communities decay, dissolve, or evolve beyond the contemporary boundaries of science. SciEnds is a research network cultivating case studies of the ends of sciences in order to motivate a new approach to thinking about the developmental trajectories of scientific disciplines, communities, institutions, and the ordering of knowledge. This working group explores specific cases of the ends of sciences as well as reflects on general methodological questions raised by scrutinizing the unmaking of scientific practices.

Please set your timezone

Participants at Consortium activities will treat each other with respect and consideration to create a collegial, inclusive, and professional environment that is free from any form of discrimination, harassment, or retaliation.

Participants will avoid any inappropriate actions or statements based on individual characteristics such as age, race, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, marital status, nationality, political affiliation, ability status, educational background, or any other characteristic protected by law. Disruptive or harassing behavior of any kind will not be tolerated. Harassment includes but is not limited to inappropriate or intimidating behavior and language, unwelcome jokes or comments, unwanted touching or attention, offensive images, photography without permission, and stalking.

Participants may send reports or concerns about violations of this policy to conduct@chstm.org.

Upcoming Meetings

Wednesday, March 5, 2025, 10:00 - 11:30 am EST

We will discuss two readings on the end of natural history:

  • Bernard Lightman, “The History of Victorian Scientific Naturalism: Huxley, Spencer and the End of Natural History,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 58 (2016): 17–23.
  • Richard Lewontin and Richard Levins, “The End of Natural History?,” Capitalism Nature Socialism 7, no. 1, (1996): 95–98.

Both are available in the attached zip file.
 

Wednesday, April 2, 2025, 10:00 - 11:30 am EDT

TBA

Wednesday, May 7, 2025, 10:00 - 11:30 am EDT

TBA

Past Meetings

-

Reading:

Simon Schaffer, "Scientific Discoveries and the End of Natural Philosophy," Social Studies of Science 16, no. 3 (1986): 387–420.
 

Group Conveners

Alex Aylward

Alex Aylward is Departmental Lecturer in History of Science at the Faculty of History, Oxford University. He works in history of the modern life sciences, especially evolutionary biology, genetics, and eugenics.

 

jmartin

Joseph Martin

Joseph Martin is Associate Professor of the History of Science and Technology at Durham University. He has published on the history of twentieth-century physical sciences and the philosophy of science and technology.

 

Michelle Pfeffer

Michelle Pfeffer is a Fellow of Magdalen College, Oxford. She is an early modernist focusing on history of science, religion, and scholarship in Europe with an emphasis on the history of astrology.

 

You must be a member to view resources. Login or create an account